CaseTrail

Thomas F. Conroy v. Walter Aniskoff, Jr.

507 U.S. 511 · Decided March 31, 1993 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Thomas F. Conroy v. Walter Aniskoff, Jr. was decided on March 31, 1993 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Military, active duty” in the Civil Rights area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
507 U.S. 511 · 113 S. Ct. 1562 · 123 L. Ed. 2d 229 · 1993 U.S. LEXIS 2555
Docket number
91-1353
Decided
March 31, 1993
Argued
January 11, 1993
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
John Paul Stevens
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Civil Rights
Legal provision
50 U.S.C. § 525
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Thomas F. Conroy v. Walter Aniskoff, Jr., et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1992-051, docket 1992-051-01.

Other cases on “Military, active duty”

See all

Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error