CaseTrail

Thigpen v. Roberts

468 U.S. 27 · Decided June 27, 1984 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Thigpen v. Roberts was decided on June 27, 1984 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Double jeopardy” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
468 U.S. 27 · 104 S. Ct. 2916 · 82 L. Ed. 2d 23 · 1984 U.S. LEXIS 127
Docket number
82-1330
Decided
June 27, 1984
Argued
April 23, 1984
Court era
Burger Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Majority opinion
Byron R. White
Opinion assigned by
Warren E. Burger
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Double jeopardy
Legal provision
Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Thigpen, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, et al. v. Roberts

SCDB identifiers: case 1983-143, docket 1983-143-01.

Other cases on “Double jeopardy”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error