CaseTrail

Teague v. Lane

489 U.S. 288 · Decided February 22, 1989 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Teague v. Lane was decided on February 22, 1989 by a vote of 7–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Habeas corpus” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
489 U.S. 288 · 109 S. Ct. 1060 · 103 L. Ed. 2d 334 · 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1043
Docket number
87-5259
Decided
February 22, 1989
Argued
October 4, 1988
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
7–2
Majority opinion
Sandra Day O'Connor
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Habeas corpus
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.DissentWrote an opinion
Justice Byron R. WhiteSpecial concurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Thurgood MarshallDissent
Justice Harry A. BlackmunSpecial concurrenceWrote an opinion
Chief Justice William H. RehnquistMajority
Justice John Paul StevensSpecial concurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Sandra Day O'ConnorMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice Antonin ScaliaMajority
Justice Anthony M. KennedyMajority

Full case caption

Teague v. Lane, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1988-041, docket 1988-041-01.

Other cases on “Habeas corpus”

See all

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error