Taylor v. United States
495 U.S. 575 · Decided May 29, 1990 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Taylor v. United States was decided on May 29, 1990 unanimously (9–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Statutory construction of criminal laws, sentencing guidelines” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 495 U.S. 575 · 110 S. Ct. 2143 · 109 L. Ed. 2d 607 · 1990 U.S. LEXIS 2788
- Docket number
- 88-7194
- Decided
- May 29, 1990
- Argued
- February 28, 1990
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- 18 U.S.C. § 924
- Type of law
- Infrequently litigated statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority |
Full case caption
Taylor v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1989-086, docket 1989-086-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Statutory construction of criminal laws, sentencing guidelines”
- Thomas Braxton v. United States
- Harold Ray Wade v. United States
- William Fex v. Michigan
- United States v. Sharon Dunnigan
- Terry Lynn Stinson v. United States
- Stacey C. Koon v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: 18 U.S.C. § 924
- Thomas Lee Deal v. United States
- John Angus Smith v. United States
- Darren J. Custis v. United States
- Roland J. Bailey v. United States
- Frank J. Muscarello v. United States
- United States v. Jacinto Rodriguez-Moreno
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Michael Terrell v. Terry L. Morris
- James v. Illinois
- Dowling v. United States
- Holland v. Illinois
- Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Bouknight
- United States v. Rene Martin Verdugo-Urquidez
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error