Steiney Richards v. Wisconsin
520 U.S. 385 · Decided April 28, 1997 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Steiney Richards v. Wisconsin was decided on April 28, 1997 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Search and seizure (general)” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 520 U.S. 385 · 117 S. Ct. 1416 · 137 L. Ed. 2d 615 · 1997 U.S. LEXIS 2794
- Docket number
- 96-5955
- Decided
- April 28, 1997
- Argued
- March 24, 1997
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- John Paul Stevens
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Search and seizure (general)
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Fourth Amendment
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
Steiney Richards v. Wisconsin
SCDB identifiers: case 1996-047, docket 1996-047-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Search and seizure (general)”
- United States v. Hernan Ramirez
- Saul Ornelas and Ismael Ornelas-Ledesma v. United States
- Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Keith M. Scott
- Minnesota v. Wayne Thomas Carter
- Sharlene Wilson v. Arkansas
- Charles H. Wilson v. Harry Layne
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourth Amendment
- Walker L. Chandler v. Zell D. MillerLaw held unconstitutional
- Maryland v. Jerry Lee Wilson
- Ohio v. Robert D. Robinette
- Pennsylvania v. Edwin Labron
- Michael A. Whren and James L. Brown v. United States
- Patrick Knowles v. IowaLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- California v. Kenneth Duane Roy
- Ohio v. Robert D. Robinette
- United States v. Vernon Watts
- Johnny Lynn Old Chief v. United States
- Maryland v. Jerry Lee Wilson
- Kenneth Lynce v. Hamilton MathisLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error