Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation
332 U.S. 194 · Decided June 23, 1947 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation was decided on June 23, 1947 by a vote of 5–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Frank Murphy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Securities regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 332 U.S. 194 · 67 S. Ct. 1575 · 91 L. Ed. 1995 · 1947 U.S. LEXIS 2988
- Docket number
- 81
- Decided
- June 23, 1947
- Argued
- December 13, 1946
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–2
- Majority opinion
- Frank Murphy
- Opinion assigned by
- Hugo L. Black
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Securities regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- 15 U.S.C. § 79
- Type of law
- Infrequently litigated statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Dissent | |
| Justice Frank Murphy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Wiley B. Rutledge | Majority | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Special concurrence |
Did not participate: William O. Douglas, Fred M. Vinson.
Full case caption
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1946-133, docket 1946-133-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Securities regulation”
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Agnew
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp.
- Niagara Hudson Power Corp. v. Leventritt
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co.
- Wilko v. Swan
Cases on the same legal provision: 15 U.S.C. § 79
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. New England Electric System
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. New England Electric System
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. WalkerAltered precedent
- Champlin Refining Co. v. United States
- United States v. Howard P. Foley Co., Inc.
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationLaw held unconstitutional
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
- Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. Green
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error