Schweiker v. Hogan
457 U.S. 569 · Decided June 21, 1982 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Schweiker v. Hogan was decided on June 21, 1982 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Poverty law, constitutional” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 457 U.S. 569 · 102 S. Ct. 2597 · 73 L. Ed. 2d 227 · 1982 U.S. LEXIS 135
- Docket number
- 81-213
- Decided
- June 21, 1982
- Argued
- March 24, 1982
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- John Paul Stevens
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Poverty law, constitutional
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fifth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Hogan et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1981-133, docket 1981-133-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Poverty law, constitutional”
- Blum v. Yaretsky
- Schweiker v. Wilson
- Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Florida Nursing Home Association
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz
- Harris v. Rosario
- Califano v. WestcottLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (equal protection)
- Hobby v. United States
- Califano v. Boles
- Davis v. Passman
- Vance v. Bradley
- United States v. Antelope
- Alexander v. Fioto
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Chardon v. Fernandez
- Ralston v. Robinson
- Polk County v. Dodson
- Blanding v. Dubose
- Cabell v. Chavez-Salido
- Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error