Schneider v. Smith
390 U.S. 17 · Decided January 16, 1968 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Schneider v. Smith was decided on January 16, 1968 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Internal security legislation” in the First Amendment area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 390 U.S. 17 · 88 S. Ct. 682 · 19 L. Ed. 2d 799 · 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2713
- Docket number
- 196
- Decided
- January 16, 1968
- Argued
- December 12, 1967
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Internal security legislation
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (association)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Special concurrence | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Thurgood Marshall.
Full case caption
Schneider v. Smith, Commandant, United States Coast Guard
SCDB identifiers: case 1967-059, docket 1967-059-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Internal security legislation”
- United States v. RobelLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Laub
- Travis v. United States
- Dennis v. United States
- Bryson v. United States
- Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control BoardLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (association)
- Degregory v. Attorney General of New Hampshire
- Dombrowski v. PfisterLaw held unconstitutional
- Baird v. State Bar of Arizona
- In re Stolar
- United Transportation Union v. State Bar of Michigan
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama ex Rel. Flowers
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Associated Press v. Walker
- Potomac News Co. v. United States
- Conner v. City of Hammond
- Central Magazine Sales, Ltd. v. United States
- Beckley Newspapers Corp. v. Hanks
- Chance v. California
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error