CaseTrail

Schneider v. Rusk

377 U.S. 163 · Decided May 18, 1964 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Schneider v. Rusk was decided on May 18, 1964 by a vote of 5–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Immigration, loss of citizenship or denaturalization” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB codes this decision as formally altering one or more of the Court's own precedents. SCDB records that the Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
377 U.S. 163 · 84 S. Ct. 1187 · 12 L. Ed. 2d 218 · 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1275
Docket number
368
Decided
May 18, 1964
Argued
April 2, 1964
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
5–3
Majority opinion
William O. Douglas
Opinion assigned by
Earl Warren
How the case arrived
Appeal
Issue area
Civil Rights
Legal provision
Immigration and Nationality statutes
Type of law
Federal statute
Altered precedent
Yes — formally altered the Court's precedent
Held unconstitutional
An act of Congress
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Did not participate: William J. Brennan Jr..

Full case caption

Schneider v. Rusk, Secretary of State

SCDB identifiers: case 1963-113, docket 1963-113-01.

Other cases on “Immigration, loss of citizenship or denaturalization”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Immigration and Nationality statutes

Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error