Salsburg v. Maryland
346 U.S. 545 · Decided January 11, 1954 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Salsburg v. Maryland was decided on January 11, 1954 by a vote of 7–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Harold H. Burton wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Search and seizure (general)” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 346 U.S. 545 · 74 S. Ct. 280 · 98 L. Ed. 2d 281 · 1954 U.S. LEXIS 2532
- Docket number
- 38
- Decided
- January 11, 1954
- Argued
- October 20, 1953
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–1
- Majority opinion
- Harold H. Burton
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Search and seizure (general)
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Majority | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Justice Sherman Minton | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority |
Did not participate: Stanley F. Reed.
Full case caption
Salsburg v. Maryland
SCDB identifiers: case 1953-023, docket 1953-023-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Search and seizure (general)”
- Walder v. United States
- Irvine v. California
- On Lee v. United States
- United States v. Jeffers
- Breithaupt v. Abram
- Kremen v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Hernandez v. Texas
- Brown v. Board of Education of TopekaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Avery v. Georgia
- Watson et Ux. v. Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd.
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.
- Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Lemke v. United States
- United States v. Debrow
- United States v. Five Gambling Devices Etc.
- Nevada and New York v. Stacher.
- United States v. Morgan
- North v. Florida
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error