CaseTrail

Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

395 U.S. 352 · Decided June 9, 1969 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. was decided on June 9, 1969 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Election of remedies” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
395 U.S. 352 · 89 S. Ct. 1835 · 23 L. Ed. 2d 360 · 1969 U.S. LEXIS 3100
Docket number
436
Decided
June 9, 1969
Argued
February 25, 1969
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Byron R. White
Opinion assigned by
Earl Warren
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
46 U.S.C. § 761
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Rodrigue et al. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1968-120, docket 1968-120-01.

Other cases on “Election of remedies”

See all

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error