CaseTrail

Randall Wright v. Joseph L. Van Patten

552 U.S. 120 · Decided January 7, 2008 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Randall Wright v. Joseph L. Van Patten was decided on January 7, 2008 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Right to counsel” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
552 U.S. 120 · 128 S. Ct. 743 · 169 L. Ed. 2d 583 · 2008 U.S. LEXIS 200
Docket number
07-212
Decided
January 7, 2008
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Per curiam (no oral argument)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Right to counsel
Legal provision
Sixth Amendment (other provisions)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Randall Wright, Sheriff, Shawano County, Wisconsin v. Joseph L. Van Patten

SCDB identifiers: case 2007-009, docket 2007-009-01.

Other cases on “Right to counsel”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Sixth Amendment (other provisions)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error