Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States
410 U.S. 366 · Decided February 22, 1973 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States was decided on February 22, 1973 by a vote of 4–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 410 U.S. 366 · 93 S. Ct. 1022 · 35 L. Ed. 2d 359 · 1973 U.S. LEXIS 131
- Docket number
- 71-991
- Decided
- February 22, 1973
- Argued
- December 5, 1972
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 4–3
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- William O. Douglas
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Federal Power Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Dissent | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent |
Did not participate: Harry A. Blackmun, Lewis F. Powell Jr..
Full case caption
Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1972-057, docket 1972-057-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd.
- Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
- Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange
- Flood v. Kuhn
- United States v. Topco Associates, Inc.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Power Act
- Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Federal Power Commission
- Federal Power Commission v. Florida Power & Light Co.
- Gainesville Utilities Department v. Florida Power Corp.
- Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians v. Federal Power Commission
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Federal Power Commission
- Federal Power Commission v. Conway Corp.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Gottschalk v. Benson
- Evco v. JonesLaw held unconstitutional
- Union Oil Co. of California v. the San Jacinto
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of Cleveland
- Heublein, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax Commission
- Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error