Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.
514 U.S. 175 · Decided April 3, 1995 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc. was decided on April 3, 1995 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice David H. Souter wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 514 U.S. 175 · 115 S. Ct. 1331 · 131 L. Ed. 2d 261 · 1995 U.S. LEXIS 2418
- Docket number
- 93-1677
- Decided
- April 3, 1995
- Argued
- November 28, 1994
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- David H. Souter
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local government tax
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.
SCDB identifiers: case 1994-038, docket 1994-038-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local government tax”
- Charles J. Reich v. Marcus E. CollinsLaw held unconstitutional
- Barclays Bank PLC v. Franchise Tax Board of California
- Associated Industries of Missouri v. Janette M. LohmanLaw held unconstitutional
- Fulton Corporation v. Janice H. FaulknerAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of the State of OregonLaw held unconstitutional
- Department of Revenue of Oregon v. Acf Industries, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Jonathan HealyLaw held unconstitutional
- C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Town of ClarkstownLaw held unconstitutional
- New York v. United StatesLaw held unconstitutional
- Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Michigan Department of Natural ResourcesLaw held unconstitutional
- State of Wyoming v. State of OklahomaLaw held unconstitutional
- Healy v. the Beer InstituteAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Albert Hess and Charles F. Walsh v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation
- Charles J. Reich v. Marcus E. CollinsLaw held unconstitutional
- Asgrow Seed Company v. Denny Winterboer and Becky Winterboer
- Milwaukee Brewery Workers' Pension Plan v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Company and Stroh Brewery Company
- Arthur L. Gustafson v. Alloyd Company
- Antonio Mastrobuono and Diana G. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error