New York v. United States
331 U.S. 284 · Decided May 12, 1947 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
New York v. United States was decided on May 12, 1947 by a vote of 7–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Railroad regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 331 U.S. 284 · 67 S. Ct. 1207 · 91 L. Ed. 1492 · 1947 U.S. LEXIS 2898
- Docket number
- 343
- Decided
- May 12, 1947
- Argued
- March 3, 1947
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- Fred M. Vinson
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Railroad regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Interstate Commerce Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Frank Murphy | Majority | |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Wiley B. Rutledge | Majority | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Majority |
Full case caption
New York et al. v. United States et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1946-101, docket 1946-101-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Railroad regulation”
- United States v. Powell
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States
- Krug v. Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Co.
- Insurance Group Committee v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co.
- United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.
- United States v. South Buffalo Railway Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Interstate Commerce Act
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Mechling
- United States v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co. v. Daniel
- Schwabacher v. United States
- United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission
- United States v. Pacific Coast Wholesalers' Association
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. WalkerAltered precedent
- Champlin Refining Co. v. United States
- United States v. Howard P. Foley Co., Inc.
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationLaw held unconstitutional
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
- Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. Green
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error