CaseTrail

New York v. United States

331 U.S. 284 · Decided May 12, 1947 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

New York v. United States was decided on May 12, 1947 by a vote of 7–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Railroad regulation” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
331 U.S. 284 · 67 S. Ct. 1207 · 91 L. Ed. 1492 · 1947 U.S. LEXIS 2898
Docket number
343
Decided
May 12, 1947
Argued
March 3, 1947
Court era
Vinson Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
7–2
Majority opinion
William O. Douglas
Opinion assigned by
Fred M. Vinson
How the case arrived
Appeal
Legal provision
Interstate Commerce Act
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice Hugo L. BlackMajority
Justice Stanley F. ReedMajority
Justice Felix FrankfurterDissentWrote an opinion
Justice William O. DouglasMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice Frank MurphyMajority
Justice Robert H. JacksonDissentWrote an opinion
Justice Wiley B. RutledgeMajority
Justice Harold H. BurtonMajority
Chief Justice Fred M. VinsonMajority

Full case caption

New York et al. v. United States et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1946-101, docket 1946-101-01.

Other cases on “Railroad regulation”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Interstate Commerce Act

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error