Namet v. United States
373 U.S. 179 · Decided May 13, 1963 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Namet v. United States was decided on May 13, 1963 by a vote of 7–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Potter Stewart wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Self-incrimination (general)” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 373 U.S. 179 · 83 S. Ct. 1151 · 10 L. Ed. 2d 278 · 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2622
- Docket number
- 134
- Decided
- May 13, 1963
- Argued
- March 18, 1963
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Potter Stewart
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Self-incrimination (general)
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Fifth Amendment (self-incrimination)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Arthur J. Goldberg | Majority |
Full case caption
Namet v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1962-100, docket 1962-100-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Self-incrimination (general)”
- Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United States
- Hutcheson v. United States
- Malloy v. HoganAltered precedent
- United States v. Gainey
- Griffin v. California
- Stewart v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (self-incrimination)
- Slagle v. Ohio
- McPhaul v. United States
- Stevens v. Marks
- Miranda v. ArizonaAltered precedent
- Mills v. Louisiana
- United States v. Wade
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Walton v. Arkansas
- United States v. Sampson
- Jones v. Cunningham
- Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United States
- Wong Sun v. United States
- Simler v. Conner
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error