CaseTrail

Minerva Surgical Inc. v. Hologic Inc.

141 S. Ct. 2298 · Decided June 29, 2021 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Minerva Surgical Inc. v. Hologic Inc. was decided on June 29, 2021 by a vote of 5–4. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Elena Kagan wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Patents” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
141 S. Ct. 2298 · 210 L. Ed. 2d 689 · 2021 U.S. LEXIS 3563
Docket number
20-440
Decided
June 29, 2021
Argued
April 21, 2021
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
Elena Kagan
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Patents
Legal provision
Patent Acts
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Minerva Surgical Inc. v. Hologic Inc.

SCDB identifiers: case 2020-062, docket 2020-062-01.

Other cases on “Patents”

See all

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error