McMillan v. Pennsylvania
477 U.S. 79 · Decided June 19, 1986 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
McMillan v. Pennsylvania was decided on June 19, 1986 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, miscellaneous” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 477 U.S. 79 · 106 S. Ct. 2411 · 91 L. Ed. 2d 67 · 1986 U.S. LEXIS 109
- Docket number
- 85-215
- Decided
- June 19, 1986
- Argued
- March 4, 1986
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
McMillan et al. v. Pennsylvania
SCDB identifiers: case 1985-119, docket 1985-119-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, miscellaneous”
- Martin v. Ohio
- Rivera v. Minnich
- Atkins v. Parker
- Wasman v. United States
- California v. Trombetta
- Board of Education of Paris Union School District No. 95 v. Vail
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsLaw held unconstitutional
- Bowers v. Hardwick
- Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Lavoie
- Daniels v. WilliamsAltered precedent
- Davidson v. Cannon
- Wainwright v. Greenfield
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing
- Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
- Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Lavoie
- Lyng v. Payne
- Bowen v. Public Agencies Opposed to Social Security Entrapment
- Macdonald v. County of Yolo
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error