CaseTrail

McKaskle v. Wiggins

465 U.S. 168 · Decided January 23, 1984 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

McKaskle v. Wiggins was decided on January 23, 1984 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Right to counsel” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
465 U.S. 168 · 104 S. Ct. 944 · 79 L. Ed. 2d 122 · 1984 U.S. LEXIS 24
Docket number
82-1135
Decided
January 23, 1984
Argued
November 9, 1983
Court era
Burger Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Majority opinion
Sandra Day O'Connor
Opinion assigned by
Warren E. Burger
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Right to counsel
Legal provision
Sixth Amendment (right to counsel)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

McKaskle, Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections v. Wiggins

SCDB identifiers: case 1983-030, docket 1983-030-01.

Other cases on “Right to counsel”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Sixth Amendment (right to counsel)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error