CaseTrail

Mary Berghuis v. Van Chester Thompkins

560 U.S. 370 · Decided June 1, 2010 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Mary Berghuis v. Van Chester Thompkins was decided on June 1, 2010 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Miranda warnings” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
560 U.S. 370 · 130 S. Ct. 2250 · 176 L. Ed. 2d 1098 · 2010 U.S. LEXIS 4379
Docket number
08-1470
Decided
June 1, 2010
Argued
March 1, 2010
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
Anthony M. Kennedy
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Miranda warnings
Legal provision
Fifth Amendment (Miranda warnings)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Mary Berghuis, Warden v. Van Chester Thompkins

SCDB identifiers: case 2009-061, docket 2009-061-01.

Other cases on “Miranda warnings”

See all

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error