CaseTrail

Mark J. McBurney v. Nathaniel L. Young

569 U.S. 221 · Decided April 29, 2013 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Mark J. McBurney v. Nathaniel L. Young was decided on April 29, 2013 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Freedom of Information Act and related laws” in the Privacy area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
569 U.S. 221 · 133 S. Ct. 1709 · 185 L. Ed. 2d 758 · 2013 U.S. LEXIS 3317
Docket number
12-17
Decided
April 29, 2013
Argued
February 20, 2013
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Privacy
Legal provision
Freedom of Information, Sunshine, or Privacy Act
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Mark J. McBurney, et Al., Petitioners v. Nathaniel L. Young, Deputy Commissioner and Director, Virginia Division of Child Support Enforcement, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 2012-039, docket 2012-039-01.

Other cases on “Freedom of Information Act and related laws”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Freedom of Information, Sunshine, or Privacy Act

Same Term, same area (Privacy)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error