Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez
140 S. Ct. 1721 · Decided June 8, 2020 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez was decided on June 8, 2020 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Elena Kagan wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Indigents, costs or filing fees” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2019
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 18-8369
Case details
- Citations
- 140 S. Ct. 1721 · 207 L. Ed. 2d 132 · 2020 U.S. LEXIS 3145
- Docket number
- 18-8369
- Decided
- June 8, 2020
- Argued
- February 26, 2020
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Elena Kagan
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Indigents, costs or filing fees
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. 1915
- Type of law
- Infrequently litigated statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority |
Full case caption
Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez
SCDB identifiers: case 2019-068, docket 2019-068-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Indigents, costs or filing fees”
- Bruce v. Samuels
- Coleman v. Tollefson
- Hinton v. Alabama
- Vincent F. Rivera v. Florida Department of Corrections
- M. L. B. v. S. L. J.Law held unconstitutional
- In re Maria Luisa Costell Gaydos
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Monasky v. Taglieri
- Comcast Corp. v. National Association of African American-Owned Media
- Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr
- Babb v. Wilkie
- Barton v. Barr
- Nasrallah v. Barr
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error