Liner v. Jafco, Inc.
375 U.S. 301 · Decided January 6, 1964 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Liner v. Jafco, Inc. was decided on January 6, 1964 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal preemption of state court jurisdiction” in the Federalism area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 375 U.S. 301 · 84 S. Ct. 391 · 11 L. Ed. 2d 347 · 1964 U.S. LEXIS 2268
- Docket number
- 43
- Decided
- January 6, 1964
- Argued
- November 21, 1963
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal preemption of state court jurisdiction
- Issue area
- Federalism
- Legal provision
- National Labor Relations Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Arthur J. Goldberg | Majority |
Full case caption
Liner et al. v. Jafco, Inc., et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1963-037, docket 1963-037-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal preemption of state court jurisdiction”
- Retail Clerks International Association v. Schermerhorn
- Hattiesburg Building & Trades Council v. Broome
- Local 100 v. Borden
- Local No. 207 v. Perko
- Incres Steamship Co., Ltd. v. International Maritime Workers Union
- Local No. 438 Construction & General Laborers' Union v. CurryAltered precedent
Cases on the same legal provision: National Labor Relations Act
- Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Exchange Parts Co.
- Boire v. Greyhound Corporation
- United Steelworkers of America v. National Labor Relations Board
- National Labor Relations Board v. Servette, Inc.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fruit & Vegetable Packers & Warehousemen
Same Term, same area (Federalism)
- Retail Clerks International Association v. Schermerhorn
- Yiatchos v. Yiatchos
- Humble Pipe Line Co. v. Waggonner
- Hattiesburg Building & Trades Council v. Broome
- Local 20 v. Morton
- Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp.Law held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error