CaseTrail

Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

579 U.S. 197 · Decided June 16, 2016 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. was decided on June 16, 2016 unanimously (8–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Elena Kagan wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Attorneys' and officials' fees, compensation, or licenses” in the Attorneys area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
579 U.S. 197 · 136 S. Ct. 1979 · 195 L. Ed. 2d 368 · 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3922
Docket number
15-375
Decided
June 16, 2016
Argued
April 25, 2016
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Elena Kagan
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Attorneys
Legal provision
COPYRIGHT ACT, 17 U.S.C. 505
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

SCDB identifiers: case 2015-070, docket 2015-070-01.

Other cases on “Attorneys' and officials' fees, compensation, or licenses”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: COPYRIGHT ACT, 17 U.S.C. 505

Same Term, same area (Attorneys)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error