Kansas v. Utilicorp United Inc.
497 U.S. 199 · Decided June 21, 1990 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Kansas v. Utilicorp United Inc. was decided on June 21, 1990 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 497 U.S. 199 · 110 S. Ct. 2807 · 111 L. Ed. 2d 169 · 1990 U.S. LEXIS 3293
- Docket number
- 88-2109
- Decided
- June 21, 1990
- Argued
- April 16, 1990
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clayton Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Kansas et al. v. Utilicorp United Inc.
SCDB identifiers: case 1989-124, docket 1989-124-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Texaco Inc. v. Ricky Hasbrouck
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.
- Jay Palmer v. BRG of Georgia, Inc.
- Michigan Citizens for an Independent Press v. Thornburgh
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
- Summit Health, Ltd. v. Simon J. Pinhas
Cases on the same legal provision: Clayton Act
- California v. American Stores Co.
- Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.
- Illinois v. Abbott & Associates, Inc.
- United States v. American Building Maintenance Industries
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.
- United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Northbrook National Insurance Company v. Larry W. Brewer
- Olaf A. Hallstrom v. Tillamook County
- Michigan Citizens for an Independent Press v. Thornburgh
- Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company v. Nancy J. Schwalb and William McGlone
- Bob Reves v. Ernst & Young
- Lawrence H. Crandon v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error