CaseTrail

Joseph P. Mazurek v. James H. Armstrong

520 U.S. 968 · Decided June 16, 1997 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Joseph P. Mazurek v. James H. Armstrong was decided on June 16, 1997 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Abortion and contraceptives” in the Privacy area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
520 U.S. 968 · 117 S. Ct. 1865 · 138 L. Ed. 2d 162 · 1997 U.S. LEXIS 3687
Docket number
96-1104
Decided
June 16, 1997
Decision type
Per curiam (no oral argument)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Privacy
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Chief Justice William H. RehnquistMajority
Justice John Paul StevensJurisdictional dissentWrote an opinion
Justice Sandra Day O'ConnorMajority
Justice Antonin ScaliaMajority
Justice Anthony M. KennedyMajority
Justice David H. SouterMajority
Justice Clarence ThomasMajority
Justice Ruth Bader GinsburgJurisdictional dissent
Justice Stephen G. BreyerJurisdictional dissent

Full case caption

Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General of Montana v. James H. Armstrong et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1996-074, docket 1996-074-01.

Other cases on “Abortion and contraceptives”

See all

Same Term, same area (Privacy)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error