CaseTrail

John E. Wetzel v. James Lambert

565 U.S. 520 · Decided February 21, 2012 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

John E. Wetzel v. James Lambert was decided on February 21, 2012 by a vote of 6–3. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Discovery and inspection in criminal cases” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
565 U.S. 520 · 132 S. Ct. 1195 · 182 L. Ed. 2d 35 · 2012 U.S. LEXIS 1684
Docket number
11-38
Decided
February 21, 2012
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Per curiam (no oral argument)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Type of law
No legal provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

John E. Wetzel, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et Al., Petitioners v. James Lambert

SCDB identifiers: case 2011-024, docket 2011-024-01.

Other cases on “Discovery and inspection in criminal cases”

See all

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error