CaseTrail

John A. Pace v. David Diguglielmo

544 U.S. 408 · Decided April 27, 2005 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

John A. Pace v. David Diguglielmo was decided on April 27, 2005 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Untimely filing” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
544 U.S. 408 · 125 S. Ct. 1807 · 161 L. Ed. 2d 669 · 2005 U.S. LEXIS 3705
Docket number
03-9627
Decided
April 27, 2005
Argued
February 28, 2005
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
William H. Rehnquist
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Untimely filing
Issue area
Judicial Power
Legal provision
28 U.S.C. §§ 2241–2255 (habeas corpus)
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

John A. Pace v. David Diguglielmo, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 2004-043, docket 2004-043-01.

Other cases on “Untimely filing”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241–2255 (habeas corpus)

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error