CaseTrail

Joan Growe v. James Emison

507 U.S. 25 · Decided February 23, 1993 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Joan Growe v. James Emison was decided on February 23, 1993 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Comity, civil rights” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
507 U.S. 25 · 113 S. Ct. 1075 · 122 L. Ed. 2d 388 · 1993 U.S. LEXIS 1780
Docket number
91-1420
Decided
February 23, 1993
Argued
November 2, 1992
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Antonin Scalia
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Appeal
Issue area
Judicial Power
Legal provision
Voting Rights Act of 1965
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Joan Growe, Secretary of State of Minnesota, et al. v. James Emison, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1992-029, docket 1992-029-01.

Other cases on “Comity, civil rights”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Voting Rights Act of 1965

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error