Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon Pacific Industries, Inc.
420 U.S. 184 · Decided February 19, 1975 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon Pacific Industries, Inc. was decided on February 19, 1975 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Railroad regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 420 U.S. 184 · 95 S. Ct. 909 · 43 L. Ed. 2d 121 · 1975 U.S. LEXIS 133
- Docket number
- 73-1210
- Decided
- February 19, 1975
- Argued
- November 20, 1974
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Railroad regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Interstate Commerce Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Full case caption
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon Pacific Industries, Inc., et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1974-043, docket 1974-043-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Railroad regulation”
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. National Association of Railroad Passengers
- Ralston Purina Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.
- Atchison v. Wichita Board of Trade
- United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Steel Corp.
- Norfolk & Western Railroad Co. v. Nemitz
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Interstate Commerce Act
- United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
- Port of Portland v. United States
- Mobil Alaska Pipeline Co. v. United States
- Southern Railway Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp.
- United States v. City of Chicago
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight Service
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co., Inc.
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.
- Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co.
- Standard Pressed Steel Co. v. Department of Revenue of Washington
- Train v. City of New York
- Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error