In re Eileen Vey
520 U.S. 303 · Decided April 14, 1997 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
In re Eileen Vey was decided on April 14, 1997 by a vote of 8–1. SCDB codes the disposition as “petition denied or appeal dismissed.” The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Indigents, Supreme Court docketing fee” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 520 U.S. 303 · 117 S. Ct. 1294 · 137 L. Ed. 2d 510 · 1997 U.S. LEXIS 2219
- Docket number
- 96-8005
- Decided
- April 14, 1997
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Petition denied or appeal dismissed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Indigents, Supreme Court docketing fee
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Supreme Court Rules
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
In re Eileen Vey
SCDB identifiers: case 1996-043, docket 1996-043-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Indigents, Supreme Court docketing fee”
- Eileen Vey v. William J. Clinton
- Carson Lynn Brown v. R. Williams
- Lorenzo Arteaga v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Glendora v. John Porzio
- Liang-Houh Shieh v. Edward Kakita
- Sylvester Jones v. Abc-Tv
Cases on the same legal provision: Supreme Court Rules
- In re Maria Luisa Costell Gaydos
- Vincent F. Rivera v. Florida Department of Corrections
- Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. U. S. Philips Corporation
- Roy A. Day v. Donald P. Day
- In re George Sassower
- John Robert Demos, Jr. v. Michael C. Storrie
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- United States Department of State v. Legal Assistance for Vietnamese Asylum Seekers, Inc.
- Vicky M. Lopez v. Monterey County
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Yueh-Shaio Yang
- In re Maria Luisa Costell Gaydos
- M. L. B. v. S. L. J.Law held unconstitutional
- Darlene Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error