Honig v. Students of the California School for the Blind
471 U.S. 148 · Decided April 1, 1985 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Honig v. Students of the California School for the Blind was decided on April 1, 1985 by a vote of 5–3. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Mootness” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 471 U.S. 148 · 105 S. Ct. 1820 · 85 L. Ed. 2d 114 · 1985 U.S. LEXIS 199
- Docket number
- 84-436
- Decided
- April 1, 1985
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–3
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Mootness
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr..
Full case caption
Honig, Superintendent of Public Instruction of California, et al. v. Students of the California School for the Blind et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1984-075, docket 1984-075-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Mootness”
- Mintzes v. Buchanon
- Board of License Commissioners of the Town of Tiverton v. Pastore
- United States Department of Justice v. Provenzano
- Lake Coal Co., Inc. v. Roberts & Schaefer Co.
- United States v. Koecher
- United States Department of the Treasury v. Galioto
Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.
- Allen v. Wright
- Secretary of State of Maryland v. Joseph H. Munson Co., Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- International Union v. Brock
- Verlinden Bv v. Central Bank of Nigeria
- City of Los Angeles v. Lyons
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- United States Department of Justice v. Provenzano
- Board of License Commissioners of the Town of Tiverton v. Pastore
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion
- Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management
- Heckler v. Chaney
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error