Henderson v. United States
339 U.S. 816 · Decided June 5, 1950 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Henderson v. United States was decided on June 5, 1950 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Harold H. Burton wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Desegregation (general)” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 339 U.S. 816 · 70 S. Ct. 843 · 94 L. Ed. 2d 1302 · 1950 U.S. LEXIS 2488
- Docket number
- 25
- Decided
- June 5, 1950
- Argued
- April 3, 1950
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Harold H. Burton
- Opinion assigned by
- Fred M. Vinson
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Desegregation (general)
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Interstate Commerce Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Majority | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Majority | |
| Justice Sherman Minton | Majority |
Did not participate: Tom C. Clark.
Full case caption
Henderson v. United States et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1949-093, docket 1949-093-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Desegregation (general)”
- Cassell v. Texas
- Shepherd v. Florida
- Shelley et Ux. v. Kraemer et Ux.
- Hurd et Ux. v. Hodge
- Moore v. New York
- Bob-Lo Excursion Co. v. Michigan
Cases on the same legal provision: Interstate Commerce Act
- Railway Labor Executives' Association v. United States
- United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.
- Reider v. Thompson
- United States v. Pacific Coast Wholesalers' Association
- United States v. Texas & Pacific Motor Transport Co.
- United States v. Champlin Refining Co.
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.
- Savorgnan v. United States
- United States ex Rel. Eichenlaub v. Shaughnessy
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath
- Hiatt v. Brown
- Cassell v. Texas
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error