Haynes v. Washington
373 U.S. 503 · Decided May 27, 1963 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Haynes v. Washington was decided on May 27, 1963 by a vote of 5–4. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Arthur J. Goldberg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Involuntary confession” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 373 U.S. 503 · 83 S. Ct. 1336 · 10 L. Ed. 2d 513 · 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1439
- Docket number
- 147
- Decided
- May 27, 1963
- Argued
- February 26, 1963
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Arthur J. Goldberg
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Involuntary confession
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | |
| Justice Arthur J. Goldberg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Haynes v. Washington
SCDB identifiers: case 1962-124, docket 1962-124-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Involuntary confession”
- Lynumn v. Illinois
- Gallegos v. Colorado
- Jackson v. DennoAltered precedent
- Lathan v. New York
- Boles v. Stevenson
- Culombe v. Connecticut
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Norvell v. Illinois
- Rideau v. Louisiana
- Brady v. Maryland
- Willner v. Committee on Character and FitnessLaw held unconstitutional
- Ferguson v. SkrupaAltered precedent
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Walton v. Arkansas
- United States v. Sampson
- Jones v. Cunningham
- Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United States
- Wong Sun v. United States
- Simler v. Conner
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error