CaseTrail

Hanrahan v. Hampton

446 U.S. 754 · Decided June 2, 1980 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Hanrahan v. Hampton was decided on June 2, 1980 by a vote of 7–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Attorneys' and officials' fees, compensation, or licenses” in the Attorneys area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
446 U.S. 754 · 100 S. Ct. 1987 · 64 L. Ed. 2d 670 · 1980 U.S. LEXIS 110
Docket number
79-912
Decided
June 2, 1980
Court era
Burger Court
Decision type
Per curiam (no oral argument)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
7–1
Opinion assigned by
Warren E. Burger
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Attorneys
Legal provision
Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.Majority
Justice Potter StewartMajority
Justice Byron R. WhiteMajority
Justice Thurgood MarshallJurisdictional dissentWrote an opinion
Chief Justice Warren E. BurgerConcurrence
Justice Harry A. BlackmunMajority
Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr.ConcurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice William H. RehnquistConcurrence

Did not participate: John Paul Stevens.

Full case caption

Hanrahan et al. v. Hampton et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1979-102, docket 1979-102-01.

Other cases on “Attorneys' and officials' fees, compensation, or licenses”

See all

Same Term, same area (Attorneys)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error