CaseTrail

Grunewald v. United States

353 U.S. 391 · Decided May 27, 1957 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Grunewald v. United States was decided on May 27, 1957 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice John M. Harlan II wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Statutory construction of criminal laws, conspiracy” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
353 U.S. 391 · 77 S. Ct. 963 · 1 L. Ed. 2d 931 · 1957 U.S. LEXIS 1723
Docket number
183
Decided
May 27, 1957
Argued
April 3, 1957
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
John M. Harlan II
Opinion assigned by
Earl Warren
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice Hugo L. BlackSpecial concurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Felix FrankfurterMajority
Justice William O. DouglasSpecial concurrence
Justice Harold H. BurtonMajority
Justice Tom C. ClarkMajority
Chief Justice Earl WarrenSpecial concurrence
Justice John M. Harlan IIMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.Special concurrence
Justice Charles E. WhittakerMajority

Full case caption

Grunewald v. United States

SCDB identifiers: case 1956-088, docket 1956-088-01.

Other cases on “Statutory construction of criminal laws, conspiracy”

See all

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error