Goldfarb et Ux. v. Virginia State Bar
421 U.S. 773 · Decided June 16, 1975 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Goldfarb et Ux. v. Virginia State Bar was decided on June 16, 1975 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 421 U.S. 773 · 95 S. Ct. 2004 · 44 L. Ed. 2d 572 · 1975 U.S. LEXIS 13
- Docket number
- 74-70
- Decided
- June 16, 1975
- Argued
- March 25, 1975
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Warren E. Burger
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Sherman Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr..
Full case caption
Goldfarb et Ux. v. Virginia State Bar et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1974-116, docket 1974-116-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Gordon v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
- United States v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co., Inc.
- Abbott Laboratories v. Portland Retail Druggists Assn., Inc.
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex Hospital
- Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Sherman Act
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
- Rice v. Norman Williams Co.
- United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington
- Local Union No. 189 v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.
- United States v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Lexington
- Los Angeles Meat & Provision Drivers Union v. United States
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co., Inc.
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.
- Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co.
- Standard Pressed Steel Co. v. Department of Revenue of Washington
- Train v. City of New York
- Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error