Goldblatt v. Town of Hempstead
369 U.S. 590 · Decided May 14, 1962 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Goldblatt v. Town of Hempstead was decided on May 14, 1962 unanimously (7–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Tom C. Clark wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, takings clause” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 369 U.S. 590 · 82 S. Ct. 987 · 8 L. Ed. 2d 130 · 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1269
- Docket number
- 78
- Decided
- May 14, 1962
- Argued
- January 15, 1962
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Tom C. Clark
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, takings clause
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fifth Amendment (takings clause)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority |
Did not participate: Felix Frankfurter, Byron R. White.
Full case caption
Goldblatt et al. v. Town of Hempstead
SCDB identifiers: case 1961-066, docket 1961-066-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, takings clause”
- Griggs v. Allegheny County
- United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.
- Armstrong v. United States
- Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCracken
- United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.
- United States v. Dow
Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (takings clause)
- United States v. Grand River Dam Authority
- General Box Co. v. United States
- United States v. Fuller et Ux.
- United States v. Alcea Band of Tillamooks
- City of Pittsburgh v. Alco Parking Corp.
- Gurley v. Rhoden
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error