CaseTrail

Goett v. Union Carbide Corp.

361 U.S. 340 · Decided January 18, 1960 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Goett v. Union Carbide Corp. was decided on January 18, 1960 by a vote of 5–4. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Election of remedies” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
361 U.S. 340 · 80 S. Ct. 357 · 4 L. Ed. 2d 341 · 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1884
Docket number
3
Decided
January 18, 1960
Argued
November 12, 1959
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Per curiam (orally argued)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Opinion assigned by
Earl Warren
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice Hugo L. BlackConcurrenceCo-authored an opinion
Justice Felix FrankfurterDissent
Justice William O. DouglasConcurrenceCo-authored an opinion
Justice Tom C. ClarkMajority
Chief Justice Earl WarrenConcurrenceCo-authored an opinion
Justice John M. Harlan IIDissentWrote an opinion
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.ConcurrenceCo-authored an opinion
Justice Charles E. WhittakerDissentWrote an opinion
Justice Potter StewartDissentWrote an opinion

Full case caption

Goett, Administratrix, v. Union Carbide Corp. et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1959-026, docket 1959-026-01.

Other cases on “Election of remedies”

See all

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error