CaseTrail

Fri v. Sierra Club

412 U.S. 541 · Decided June 11, 1973 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Fri v. Sierra Club was decided on June 11, 1973 by a vote of 4–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. The Justices were equally divided, which leaves the lower court's judgment in place without setting precedent. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Natural resources and environmental protection” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
412 U.S. 541 · 93 S. Ct. 2770 · 37 L. Ed. 2d 140 · 1973 U.S. LEXIS 122
Docket number
72-804
Decided
June 11, 1973
Argued
April 18, 1973
Court era
Burger Court
Decision type
Equally divided vote
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
4–4
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Decision direction (SCDB)
Unspecifiable what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice William O. DouglasEqually divided vote
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.Equally divided vote
Justice Potter StewartEqually divided vote
Justice Byron R. WhiteEqually divided vote
Justice Thurgood MarshallEqually divided vote
Chief Justice Warren E. BurgerEqually divided vote
Justice Harry A. BlackmunEqually divided vote
Justice William H. RehnquistEqually divided vote

Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr..

Full case caption

Fri, Acting Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency v. Sierra Club et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1972-144, docket 1972-144-01.

Other cases on “Natural resources and environmental protection”

See all

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error