CaseTrail

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt

139 S. Ct. 1485 · Decided May 13, 2019 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt was decided on May 13, 2019 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Governmental liability” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB codes this decision as formally altering one or more of the Court's own precedents.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
139 S. Ct. 1485 · 203 L. Ed. 2d 768 · 2019 U.S. LEXIS 3399
Docket number
17-1299
Decided
May 13, 2019
Argued
January 9, 2019
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
Clarence Thomas
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Eleventh Amendment
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Altered precedent
Yes — formally altered the Court's precedent
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt

SCDB identifiers: case 2018-036, docket 2018-036-01.

Other cases on “Governmental liability”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Eleventh Amendment

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error