First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles
482 U.S. 304 · Decided June 9, 1987 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles was decided on June 9, 1987 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, takings clause” in the Due Process area. SCDB records that the Court declared a municipal or other local ordinance unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 482 U.S. 304 · 107 S. Ct. 2378 · 96 L. Ed. 2d 250 · 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2606
- Docket number
- 85-1199
- Decided
- June 9, 1987
- Argued
- January 14, 1987
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, takings clause
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fifth Amendment (takings clause)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A municipal or other local ordinance
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority |
Full case caption
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles, California
SCDB identifiers: case 1986-118, docket 1986-118-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, takings clause”
- Nollan et Ux. v. California Coastal Commission
- Hodel v. IrvingLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. Debenedictis
- Federal Communications Commission v. Florida Power Corp.
- Richard Pennell and Tri-County Apartment House Owners Association v. City of San Jose and City Council of San Jose
Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (takings clause)
- Agins et Ux. v. City of Tiburon
- Gurley v. Rhoden
- City of Pittsburgh v. Alco Parking Corp.
- United States v. Fuller et Ux.
- United States v. Grand River Dam Authority
- General Box Co. v. United States
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Asahi Metal Industry Co., Ltd. v. Superior Court of California
- Martin v. Ohio
- Federal Communications Commission v. Florida Power Corp.
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. Debenedictis
- United States v. Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma
- Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error