Dickman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
465 U.S. 330 · Decided February 21, 1984 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Dickman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue was decided on February 21, 1984 by a vote of 7–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal taxation of gifts and business expenses” in the Federal Taxation area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 465 U.S. 330 · 104 S. Ct. 1086 · 79 L. Ed. 2d 343 · 1984 U.S. LEXIS 30
- Docket number
- 82-1041
- Decided
- February 21, 1984
- Argued
- November 1, 1983
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Warren E. Burger
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal taxation of gifts and business expenses
- Issue area
- Federal Taxation
- Legal provision
- Internal Revenue Code
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
Dickman et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
SCDB identifiers: case 1983-037, docket 1983-037-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal taxation of gifts and business expenses”
- Diedrich v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Jewett et Ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- United States v. Hemme
- United California Bank v. United States
- Hernandez v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Internal Revenue Code
- United States v. Arthur Young & Co.
- Badaracco v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Engle et Ux.
- United States v. Rodgers
- Bob Jones University v. United StatesAltered precedent
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Tufts
Same Term, same area (Federal Taxation)
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Engle et Ux.
- Badaracco v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- United States v. Arthur Young & Co.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error