CaseTrail

David Allen Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania

537 U.S. 101 · Decided January 14, 2003 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

David Allen Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania was decided on January 14, 2003 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Double jeopardy” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
537 U.S. 101 · 123 S. Ct. 732 · 154 L. Ed. 2d 588 · 2003 U.S. LEXIS 748
Docket number
01-7574
Decided
January 14, 2003
Argued
November 4, 2002
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
Antonin Scalia
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Double jeopardy
Legal provision
Fifth Amendment (double jeopardy)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

David Allen Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania

SCDB identifiers: case 2002-012, docket 2002-012-01.

Other cases on “Double jeopardy”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (double jeopardy)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error