CaseTrail

Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood, U.S. District Judge

369 U.S. 469 · Decided April 30, 1962 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood, U.S. District Judge was decided on April 30, 1962 unanimously (7–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Hugo L. Black wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Jury trial right” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
369 U.S. 469 · 82 S. Ct. 894 · 8 L. Ed. 2d 44 · 1962 U.S. LEXIS 2307
Docket number
244
Decided
April 30, 1962
Argued
February 19, 1962
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
7–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Hugo L. Black
Opinion assigned by
Earl Warren
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Jury trial right
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice Hugo L. BlackMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice William O. DouglasSpecial concurrence
Justice Tom C. ClarkMajority
Chief Justice Earl WarrenMajority
Justice John M. Harlan IISpecial concurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.Majority
Justice Potter StewartSpecial concurrence

Did not participate: Felix Frankfurter, Byron R. White.

Full case caption

Dairy Queen, Inc., v. Wood, U.S. District Judge, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1961-060, docket 1961-060-01.

Other cases on “Jury trial right”

See all

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error