CaseTrail

Cty. of Los Angeles v. Mendez

137 S. Ct. 1539 · Decided May 30, 2017 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Cty. of Los Angeles v. Mendez was decided on May 30, 2017 unanimously (8–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Liability under civil rights acts” in the Civil Rights area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
137 S. Ct. 1539 · 198 L. Ed. 2d 52 · 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3396
Docket number
16-369
Decided
May 30, 2017
Argued
March 22, 2017
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Civil Rights
Legal provision
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts)
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Did not participate: Neil M. Gorsuch.

Full case caption

Cty. of Los Angeles v. Mendez

SCDB identifiers: case 2016-055, docket 2016-055-01.

Other cases on “Liability under civil rights acts”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts)

Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error