County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund
140 S. Ct. 1462 · Decided April 23, 2020 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund was decided on April 23, 2020 by a vote of 6–3. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Natural resources and environmental protection” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2019
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 18-260
Case details
- Citations
- 140 S. Ct. 1462 · 206 L. Ed. 2d 640 · 2020 U.S. LEXIS 2410
- Docket number
- 18-260
- Decided
- April 23, 2020
- Argued
- November 6, 2019
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Stephen G. Breyer
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Natural resources and environmental protection
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clean Water Act (Federal Water Pollution Control Act)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Dissent | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund
SCDB identifiers: case 2019-015, docket 2019-015-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Natural resources and environmental protection”
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian
- U.S. Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association
- Sturgeon v. Frost
- Guam v. United States
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
- Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency
Cases on the same legal provision: Clean Water Act (Federal Water Pollution Control Act)
- National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense
- Entergy Corporation v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker
- Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (Toc), Inc.
- City of Burlington v. Ernest Dague, Sr.
- United States Department of Energy v. Ohio
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Rotkiske v. Klemm
- Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. Jander
- Ritzen Group Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC
- Hernandez v. Mesa
- Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma
- Citgo Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error