CaseTrail

Cordell Pearson v. Afton Callahan

555 U.S. 223 · Decided January 21, 2009 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Cordell Pearson v. Afton Callahan was decided on January 21, 2009 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Liability under civil rights acts” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB codes this decision as formally altering one or more of the Court's own precedents.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
555 U.S. 223 · 129 S. Ct. 808 · 172 L. Ed. 2d 565 · 2009 U.S. LEXIS 591
Docket number
07-751
Decided
January 21, 2009
Argued
October 14, 2008
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Civil Rights
Legal provision
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts)
Type of law
Federal statute
Altered precedent
Yes — formally altered the Court's precedent
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Cordell Pearson, et al. v. Afton Callahan

SCDB identifiers: case 2008-013, docket 2008-013-01.

Other cases on “Liability under civil rights acts”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts)

Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error