Coates v. City of Cincinnati
402 U.S. 611 · Decided June 1, 1971 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Coates v. City of Cincinnati was decided on June 1, 1971 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Potter Stewart wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Protest demonstrations” in the First Amendment area. SCDB records that the Court declared a municipal or other local ordinance unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 402 U.S. 611 · 91 S. Ct. 1686 · 29 L. Ed. 2d 214 · 1971 U.S. LEXIS 38
- Docket number
- 117
- Decided
- June 1, 1971
- Argued
- January 11, 1971
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Potter Stewart
- Opinion assigned by
- William O. Douglas
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Protest demonstrations
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A municipal or other local ordinance
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent |
Full case caption
Coates et al. v. City of Cincinnati
SCDB identifiers: case 1970-113, docket 1970-113-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Protest demonstrations”
- Cohen v. California
- Radich v. New York
- Gooding v. WilsonLaw held unconstitutional
- Schacht v. United StatesLaw held unconstitutional
- Colten v. Kentucky
- Police Department of the City of Chicago v. MosleyLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Connell v. HigginbothamLaw held unconstitutional
- Johnson v. Mississippi
- Bell v. BursonLaw held unconstitutional
- Palmer v. City of EuclidLaw held unconstitutional
- McGautha v. California
- Boddie v. ConnecticutLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Blount v. RizziLaw held unconstitutional
- Baird v. State Bar of Arizona
- In re Stolar
- Law Students Civil Rights Research Council, Inc. v. Wadmond
- United States v. Weller
- Monitor Patriot Co. v. Roy
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error