City of Meridian v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
358 U.S. 639 · Decided February 24, 1959 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
City of Meridian v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. was decided on February 24, 1959 unanimously (9–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Supreme Court jurisdiction on appeal from federal courts” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 358 U.S. 639 · 79 S. Ct. 455 · 3 L. Ed. 2d 562 · 1959 U.S. LEXIS 1492
- Docket number
- 546
- Decided
- February 24, 1959
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Abstention doctrine
- Type of law
- Other
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority |
Full case caption
City of Meridian v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
SCDB identifiers: case 1958-052, docket 1958-052-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Supreme Court jurisdiction on appeal from federal courts”
- Spevack v. Strauss
- Florida Lime and Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Jacobsen
- Rohr Aircraft Corp. v. County of San DiegoLaw held unconstitutional
- Paul v. United States
- United States v. Georgia Public Service Commission
- United States v. Jones
Cases on the same legal provision: Abstention doctrine
- Harrison v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
- County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.
- Martin v. Creasy
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Inc. v. Bennett
- Metlakatla Indian Community v. Egan
- Turner v. City of MemphisLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Hinkle v. New England Mutual Insurance Company of Boston
- Hotel Employees Local No. 255 v. Leedom
- Flemming v. Florida Citrus Exchange
- Leedom v. Kyne
- Rogers v. Calumet National Bank of Hammond
- Herrmann v. Rogers
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error